Productivity and Land Use Efficiency of Maize-Soybean Intercropping Under Different Tillage Practices at Teppi Southwestern Ethiopia

Behailu Mekonnen Abayneh

Abstract


For smallholder farmers in southwest Ethiopia, maize-soybean intercropping systems offer enormous benefits. Even though there has been little research on the socioeconomic benefits of this intercropping in the region, there is still a dearth of knowledge on the ideal cropping ratio. Accordingly, a two-year field experiment was carried out at Teppi Agricultural Research Center (TARC) during the main cropping season (under rain-fed conditions), from April 2021 to January 2023, with the aim of identifying the optimum intercropping combinations with appropriate tillage practices for enhanced land use efficiency, yield, and economic advantages of maize and soybean intercropping systems. It was laid out using a split-plot design with three replications using two tillage practices (zero tillage and conventional tillage) as main plot treatments and five intercrop combinations of maize and soybean (1:0, 0:1, 1:1, 2:1, and 1:2) as sub-plot treatments. Based on the combined data analysis, the yield attributes of the component crops and competition indices were significantly (P<0.05) affected by the main effect of maize-soybean intercropping. However, the main effect of tillage practices and their interaction with intercropping had a non-significant (P>0.05) effect on the yield attributes of the component crops and competition indices. The highest harvest index, grain yield, and aboveground biomass yield of maize and soybean were obtained from each solely cropped plot, respectively. The same plots also gave the maximum values of hundred and thousand seed weights of soybean and maize, respectively. Regarding yield and economic advantage, the highest total land equivalent ratio (LER) value (1.17), area time equivalent ratio (ATER) (1.16), and monetary advantage index (MAI) (17,224 ETB ha-1) were recorded from the 2:1 maize and soybean intercrop combination. Thus, the findings of this study suggest enhanced resource use efficiency in maize-soybean intercropping, resulting in greater yield and monetary advantage over the sole cropping of the component crops. Therefore, in conclusion, the 2:1 maize and soybean intercrop combination can be suggested as the best combination for improved land use efficiency, yield, and economic advantage in comparison with other combinations. However, prior to recommendation, the study needs to be carried out for more than two growing seasons with the inclusion of minimum tillage practices to point out the effects on maize and soybean yield, production cost, and biological and physico-chemical properties of the soil in the long run.


Keywords


Intercropping; Land use efficiency; Maize; Soybean; Tillage; Yield advantage

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abayneh, E. and Ashenaf, A. 2005. Soils of Tepi and Haru Agricultural Research Sub centers, soil survey and land evaluation section. National Soil Research Center. Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Adugna, A., Tefera, T. and Deresa, A. 2005. Sorghum production guideline: Production and research experience (Simachew Manaye, Ed.). EARO, 2005. Pp 1-31

Baye, T. G., 2017. Poverty, peasantry and agriculture in Ethiopia. Annals of Agrarian Science, Vol. 15. 420e430

Berdjour, A., Dugje, I., Dzomeku, I. and Rahman, N. 2020. Maize–soybean intercropping effect on yield productivity, weed control and diversity in northern Ghana. Weed Biol. Manag. Vol. 20:69–81

Bitew Y, Derebe B, Worku A. and Chakelie G. 2021. Response of maize and common bean to spatial and temporal differentiation in maize-common bean intercropping. PLoS ONE, Vol. 16(10):e0257203

Cheriere, T., Mathieu, L. and Guénaëlle, C. 2020. Species choice and spatial arrangement in soybean-based intercropping: Levers that drive yield and weed control. Field Crops Research, Vol. 256:10792

Choudhary, V., Anil, D. and Suresh, K. 2014. Productivity, competition behavior and weed dynamics of various row proportions of maize (Z. mays)-legumes intercropping in Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol. 84(11):1329-1334

Connolly, J., Goma, H. and Rahim, K. 2001. The information content of indicators in intercropping research. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. Vol. 87:191-207

Dapaah, H., Asafu-Agyei, J., Ennin, S. and Yamoah, C. 2003. Yield stability of cassava, maize, soya bean and cowpea intercrops. J. Agric. Sci. Vol. 140:73-82

Das, T., Bhattacharyya, R., Sharma, A., Das, S., Saad, A. and Pathak, H. 2013. Impacts of conservation agriculture on total soil organic carbon retention potential under an irrigated agro-ecosystem of the western Indo-Gangetic plains. Eur. J. Agron. Vol. 51:34-42

Dhima, K., Lithourgidis, A., Vasilakoglou, I., and Dordas, C. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research, Vol. 100(2-3):249–256

Enatalem, A., Tamado, T., Berhanu, A. and Nigusie, D. 2021. Effects of maize and mungbean intercropping on performance of the component crops and system productivity. Ethiop. J. Crop Sci. Vol. 9(1):109-138

Falong, H., Qiang, C., Aizhong, Y., Wen, Y., Hongyan, C., et al., 2015. Less carbon emissions of wheat–maize intercropping under reduced tillage in arid areas. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, Vol. 35(2):701-711

Fan, Y., Yang, F., Liu, Q., Chen, J., Wang, R., Luo, S., et al., 2017. Effects of shading on leaf structure and photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics of soybean seedlings in maize-soybean relay intercropping system. Acta Agronomica Sinica, Vol. 43(2):277-285

Feng, L., Yang, W., Zhou, Q., Tang, H., Ma,Q., Huang, G. and Wang, S. 2021. Effects of interspecific competition on crop yield and nitrogen utilization in maize-soybean intercropping system. Plant Soil Environ. Vol. 67:460-467

Gao, Y., Duan, A., Qiu, X., Liu, Z., Sun, J., Zhang, J. and Wang, H. 2010. Distribution and use efficiency of photosynthetically active radiation in strip intercropping of maize and soybean. Agron. J. Vol. 102(4):1149-1157

Ghosh, P. 2004. Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crop. Res. Vol. 88:227–237

Ghosh, P., Bandyopadhyay, K., Wanjari, R., Manna, M., Misra, A., Mohanty, M. and Rao, A. 2007. Legume effect for enhancing productivity and nutrient use-efficiency in major cropping systems–an Indian perspective: a review. J. Sustain Agr., Vol. 30:59-86

Ghosh, P., Manna, M., Bandyopadhyay, K., Ajay T. A., Wanjari, R. et al., 2006. Interspecific interaction and nutrient use in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 98:1097-1108

Girma, H., Digafe, T., Edossa, E., Belay, Y. and Weyessa, G. 2008. Spices research achievements. Revised edition, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2008; pp7-25. ISBN 978-99944-53-24-5

Gliessman, S., Rosado-May, F., Guadarrama-Zugasti, C., Jedlicka, J., Cohn, A. et al., 2007. Agro-ecology: promoting a transition towards sustainability. Ecosistemas Magazine, Vol. 16(1)

Govaerts, B., Verhulst, N., Castellanos-Navarrete, A., Sayre, K., Dixon, J. and Dendooven, L. 2009. Conservation agriculture and soil carbon sequestration: between myth and farmer reality. Crit Rev Plant Sci., Vol. 28:97-122

Hiebsch, C., and McCollum, R. 1987. Area-time equivalency ratio: a method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agronomy Journal. Vol. 79(1):15-2

Jensen, E., Carlsson, G. and Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. 2020. Intercropping of grain legumes and cereals improves the use of soil N resources and reduces the requirement for synthetic fertilizer N: A global-scale analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 40(1):1-9

Kherif, O., Seghouani, M., Zemmouri, B., Bouhenache, A., Keskes, M., et al., 2021. Understanding the response of wheat-chickpea intercropping to nitrogen fertilization using agro-ecological competitive indices under contrasting pedoclimatic conditions. Agronomy, Vol. 11:1225

Khonde, P., Tshiabukole, K., Kankolongo, M., Hauser, S., Djamba, M., et al., 2018. Evaluation of yield and competition indices for intercropped eight maize varieties, soybean and cowpea in the zone of savanna of South-West RD Congo. Open Access Library Journal, Vol. 5: e3746

Kirkegaard, J., Conyers, M., Hunt, J., Kirkby, C., Watt, M. and Rebetzke, G. 2014. Sense and nonsense in conservation agriculture: principles, pragmatism and productivity in Australian mixed farming systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, Vol. 187:133-145

Liang, C., Feng, Y., Xiaochun, W., Taiwen, Y., Xin, L., Benying, S. and Wenyu, Y. 2017. The Competitive ability of intercropped soybean in two row ratios of maize-soybean relay strip intercropping. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, Vol. 7(3):1-10

Liu, X., Tanzeelur, R., Chun, S., Benying, S., Feng, Y., Taiwen, Y., Yushan, W., et al., 2017. Changes in light environment, morphology, growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, Vol. 200:38-46

Liu, X., Tanzeelur, R., Chun, S., Feng, Y., Benying, S., Liang, C., Weizhao, B. and Wenyu, Y. 2018. Relationships among light distribution, radiation use efficiency and land equivalent ratio in maize-soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, Vol. 224:91-101

Manasa, P., Sagar, M. and Saurav, B. 2020. Yield attributes, yield, competitive ability and economics of summer maize-legume intercropping system. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, Vol. 13(1):33-38

Mbah, E., Muoneke, C. and Okpara, D. 2007. Effect of Compound fertilizer on the yield and productivity of soybean and maize in soybean/maize intercrop in southeastern

Nigeria. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, Vol. 7:87-95

Mekuria, W. 2018. The link between agricultural production and population dynamics in Ethiopia: a review. Adv Plants Agric Res., Vol. 8(4):348-353

Michler, J. and Josephson, A. 2017. To Specialize or Diversify: Agricultural diversity and poverty dynamics in Ethiopia. World Dev. Vol. 89:214–226

Negasa, D., Zerihun, J. and Gerba, D. 2021. Effects of varieties and population of soybean intercropped with maize on yield and yield components of associated crops. J. Plant Sci. Vol. 9(4):128-138

Negera, N., Tamado, T., Nigussie, D., Yibekal, A. and Bulti, T. 2023. Effects of planting density and variety on productivity of maize-faba bean intercropping system Heliyon, Vol. 9:e12967

Parihar, C., Yadav, M., Jat, S., Singh, A., Kumar, B., et al., 2016. Long term effect of conservation agriculture in maize rotations on total organic carbon, physical and biological properties of a sandy loam soil in north-western Indo-Gangetic plains. Soil Till. Res. Vol. 161:116-128

Paudel, B., Karki, T., Shah, S. and Chaudhary, N. 2015. Yield and economics of maize (Z. mays) + soybean (G. max L. Merrill) intercropping system under different tillage methods. World Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 3(2):74-77

Raza, M., Yasin, H., Gul, H., Qin, R., Mohi, U., Din, A., et al., 2022. Maize/soybean strip intercropping produces higher crop yields and saves water under semi-arid conditions. Front. Plant Sci. Vol. 13:1006720

Rustiana, R., Taslim, S., Lalu, W., Anas, Z. and Ahmad, S. 2021. Profitability and land equivalent ratio of maize and soybean intercropping on dry land agro ecosystem. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, Vol. 199:76-84

Tamer, I. and El-Rahman, R. 2016. Response of some soybean cultivars to low light intensity under different intercropping patterns with Maize. Inter. J. Appl. Agri. Sci., Vol. 2(2):21-31

Telkar, S., Singh, A. and Kamal, K. 2018. Determination of effective spatial arrangement for intercropping of maize + soybean using dry matter yield and competition interaction. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, Vol. 7(4):2239-224

Teshome, G., Tamado, T. and Negash, G. 2015. Effect of varieties and population of intercropped soybean with maize on yield and yield components at Haro Sabu, Western Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, Vol. 4(4):31-39

Usman, M., Nangere, M. and Audu, S. 2018. Advantages of Intercropping Cowpea with Maize Crop under Different Tillage Methods and Inorganic Fertilizer Rates. International Journal for Research in Agricultural and Food Science, Vol. 4(1). ISSN: 2208-2719

Wei, W., Liu, T., Shen, L., Wang, X., Zhang, S. and Zhang, W. 2022. Effect of maize (Z. mays) and soybean (G. max) intercropping on yield and root development in Xinjiang, China. Agriculture, Vol. 12:996

Willey, R. 1985. Evaluation and presentation of intercropping advantages. Experimental Agriculture, Vol. 21:119-133

Wondimu, B., Ketema, B. and Tamado, T. 2016. Effect of soybean varieties and nitrogen fertilizer rates on yield, yield components and productivity of associated crops under

maize/soybean intercropping at Mechara, Eastern Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Vol. 5(1):1-7

Worku, W. 2014. Sequential intercropping of common bean and mung bean with maize in southern Ethiopia. Experimental Agriculture, Vol. 50(1):90-108.

Yigezu, G. W., 2021. The challenges and prospects of Ethiopian agriculture. Cogent Food & Agriculture, Vol. 7:1. 192361

Yilmaz, S., Atak, M. and Erayman, M. 2008. Identification of advantages of maize-legume intercropping over solitary cropping through competition indices in the East Mediterranean Region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 111-119

Zerssa, G., Feyssa, D., Kim, D. and Eichler-Löbermann, B. 2021. Challenges of smallholder farming in Ethiopia and opportunities by adopting Climate-Smart Agriculture. Agriculture, Vol. 11:192.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpt.2023.008.2.02

Refbacks